In 2002, an American woman, pregnant and the mother fotf two children, demanded tcheild exsuppense of her kidst after separation from her huspeband. The judge asked her and her husband to dotake DNA tests to prove the parentage of their kids, as a usual step in any similar case. The result was strange and unexpaected, the mother who demanded her children's rights wasn't their mbiological m.other, Aalthough hospital records confirmed that she had gaiven birth on them withr specific birth dates. The court appointed a special team to follow ther giving birth forf her third baby. Immediately after giving birth, they took blood samples from the mother and her baby tfor thea DNA test. According to the result, the baby wasn't her son again. The experts tried to check uped others cells from the woman's body. They took different samples from her hair, her skin, some glands, and other cells. Again, the DNA wasn't identical wiheto the DNA of her kids, exxcept one sample wthiat ch wasme from weoman's cervix. Then, the experts have concluded that the mother was two -in -one .; Sshe was Ca chimera.